PhD100 – Foundations and Portfolio Preparation
Semester Assessment
Assignment:
Submit a professional portfolio that includes the following components:
- Curriculum Vitae (Academic format)
- Research statement (1–2 pages)
- Teaching philosophy and sample syllabi or teaching evaluations
- List of publications and conference papers
- Samples of published or in-progress work
- Grant proposals or project ideas
- Community engagement or outreach activities
- Professional development and certifications
Detailed Explanation
Annotated Portfolio Submission
Objective
To help doctoral candidates create a professional and reflective academic portfolio that demonstrates:
- Scholarly depth and focus
- Teaching competence and philosophy
- Research productivity and impact
- Engagement with the academic and wider community
- Preparedness for academic or professional roles
Structure & Content of the Portfolio
- Academic Curriculum Vitae (CV) (2-5 pages)
- Format: A formal academic CV (not a résumé).
- Contents Should Include:
- Full name and contact information
- Academic qualifications
- Dissertation title and advisor(s)
- Publications (peer-reviewed and others)
- Conference presentations
- Teaching experience (courses taught or TA experience)
- Research experience and affiliations
- Awards, fellowships, scholarships
- Languages, skills, memberships (e.g., academic societies)
✅ Annotation: Candidates should annotate 2–3 key items, explaining their relevance or impact (e.g., how a paper led to a collaboration or how a teaching experience influenced their philosophy).
- Research Statement (5–10 pages)
- A clear and compelling narrative that addresses:
- Main research interests
- Theoretical frameworks or methodologies used
- Contributions to the field
- Future research plans
- Interdisciplinary relevance (if applicable)
✅ Annotation: Add footnotes or endnotes on why certain themes were chosen and how they evolved. Mention how this aligns with career goals.
- Teaching Philosophy Statement and Materials (2-3 pages)
- Teaching Philosophy Statement that discusses:
- Teaching beliefs and values
- Strategies and methods
- Engagement techniques
- Assessment methods
- Inclusivity and diversity considerations
- Include sample syllabi, lesson plans, or student evaluations as evidence.
✅ Annotation: Reflect on how the teaching practices evolved or lessons learned from feedback.
- Publications and Conference Papers (2-3 pages)
- A list or section with:
- Full citations (APA, MLA, Chicago style – consistent formatting)
- Indicate peer-reviewed vs. non-peer-reviewed
- Clearly mark published, accepted, under review, or in-progress works
✅ Annotation: Highlight one or two key works with a short paragraph each, explaining:
- The central argument
- Its importance
- Its reception or application
- Samples of Published or In-Progress Work (Appendices)
- Submit:
- One published paper or chapter OR
- One dissertation chapter or working paper
✅ Annotation: Introduce the work with a 200–300 word reflective note explaining:
- Why it was selected
- The core idea
- Challenges faced and lessons learned
- Grant Proposals or Project Ideas (Appendices)
- Submit:
- A grant proposal you’ve submitted or drafted
- OR a well-developed project idea, with objectives, rationale, and expected outcomes
✅ Annotation: Include notes on:
- Funding goals
- Review feedback (if any)
- How you would improve or implement it
- Community Engagement or Outreach Activities (Appendices)
- Include:
- Public lectures, workshops, volunteer teaching
- Science or research communication (blogs, webinars)
- Work with NGOs, schools, policy, etc.
✅ Annotation: Explain your motivation, what was achieved, and how it complements your academic goals.
- Professional Development and Certifications (Appendices)
- Include evidence of:
- Workshops (pedagogy, research methods, ethics)
- Certifications (e.g., Research Ethics, Academic Writing)
- Online courses relevant to your field (e.g., Coursera, edX)
✅ Annotation: Reflect briefly on how these enhanced your competencies or research practice.
Submission Guidelines
- Format: Ms Word Doc, organized with a Table of Contents
- Naming: “[LastName]_PhD_Portfolio.doc”
- Word limit: Total portfolio not exceeding 8,000–15,000 words excluding appendices
- Annotation: All annotations must be clearly marked (e.g., in italics, footnotes, or sidebars)
- Optional: Include hyperlinks (if digital versions of publications or projects exist online)
✅ Evaluation Criteria (100% mark)
|
Component |
Weight (%) |
Key Evaluation Focus |
|
Academic CV |
10% |
Clarity, completeness, relevance |
|
Research Statement |
15% |
Vision, coherence, research depth |
|
Teaching Philosophy & Materials |
15% |
Pedagogical soundness, reflection |
|
Publications & Samples |
20% |
Quality, academic contribution |
|
Project Ideas or Grants |
10% |
Feasibility, innovation |
|
Engagement & Development |
10% |
Relevance, societal impact |
|
Annotation & Reflection |
20% |
Depth of insight, critical thinking |
Capstone Presentation / Viva Portfolio Defense
Objective: To simulate a real-world academic or industry interview.
Assignment:
Prepare a 10–15 minute recorded presentation of your portfolio, followed by a Q&A. Imagine presenting to a hiring committee or grant panel. Use this opportunity to showcase your research identity, teaching philosophy, and career trajectory. Upload recorded video to your learning portal on the approval of your course Advisor.

